Speech in Action : Expressive Dynamics and Stakes in the Theatre of Tchicaya U Tam’si"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55595/7b4ede92Keywords:
Incarted and performative speech, Protean, Modern, Self-affirmation, DemocracyAbstract
Our reflection addresses the key issue of speech in the theatrical text. It is decrypting the
inventiveness and modernity of speech in action in the dramatic creation of Tchicaya U Tam’si and
is revealing is stakes. Relying on both semiology and sociocritics, it reveals an active, protean and
moderm speech that transcends the simple saying to invest the concrete reality and impacts the
recipients of the associated message. Moreover, that incarnated and performative "tchicayan" speech
has the particualrity of ingraining in the spiritual, and harmoniously combining beauty, images,
sounds, rythm and poetic inventiveness to dramatic creation. It works thus to strenghten the theaterpoetic which disput with melted hybridization, the traditionnel hegemonic codes of the theatrical
genre. Brought by elected officials that no prognosis intended for power, the active and
impactful dramatic speech of the Congolese playwright betrays ambitious but complexed characters,
stuck in an ill-expressed self affirmation. They transform their experience of power into an auto- focused and nightmarish parenthesis for their people. Thus the Congolese Tchicaya U Tam’si is
presented as an outstanding creator of the standardized dramatic writings and as a committed writer
who reaffirms his figtht for a democratic political game animated by mature personalities prepared
for the management of power
References
Bouchardon M., 2005, « Théâtre-Poésie. Limite non-frontières entre deux genres du symbolisme à
nos jours », L’information Littéraire, 4 (vol.57), Actualité de recherche, pp. 38-43.
Dodet C., 2017, « L’activité poétique au théâtre, une forme en devenir ? À travers La trilogie des flous
de Daniel Danis et (e) de Dany Boudreault », L’Annuaire théâtral, (62), pp. 31–45.
https://doi.org/10.7202/1052747ar, Document généré le 16 mars 2025 12:58
Dodet C., 2015, « Des “transactions transitoires” entre théâtre et poésie, écriture et scène : entretien
avec Daniel Danis », Poésie en scène, Paris, Editions Orizons, pp. 215-225.
Duchet C., Sociocritique, Paris, Nathan, 1979.
Lange A., Jakubowski P., 1976, Comportement assertif responsable : Procédures cognitives et
comportementales pour les formateurs, Illinois, Research Press.
Larthomas P., 2012, Le langage dramatique, Paris, PUF.
Lioure M., 1998, L’analyse du texte de théâtre, Paris, Dunod.
Mabana C. K., 1998, L’univers mythique de Tchicaya U Tam’si à travers son écriture en prose,
Bern/Berlin, PUE.
Maron P., 1993, 25 mots clés de la psychologie et de la psychanalyse, Alleur, Marabout.
Nzanzu M., 2017, Tchicaya U Tam’si, Le feu et le chant, une poétique de la dérision, Paris,
L’Harmattan.
Ryngaert, 2014, Introduction à l’analyse du théâtre, Paris, Armand Colin, 3e édition.
Tchicaya U Tam’si, 1977, Le Zulu suivi de Vwène le fondateur, Paris, Nubia.
Ubersfeld A. et ali, 1987, Théâtre/Modes d’approche, Bruxelles, Editions Labor et Méridiens
Klincksieck.
Vigeant L., 1990, « Les objets de la sémiologie théâtrale : le texte et le spectacle », Horizon
philosophiques, Vol.1 n°1, pp. 57-79. https://doi.org/10.7202/800861ar, document généré
le 30 avril 2025
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution - No Commercial Use - No Modification 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)