On the mobilization of emotions in the addresses to the Nation of Senegalese Presidents

Linguistique

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55595/e2qywg97

Keywords:

Argument, argumentation, context, speech, emotion, pathos, persuasion,

Abstract

This article adopts a discourse analysis perspective in that it considers the object of study (the political discourse), the context, and the circumstances of the utterance, within a comprehensive dynamic of meaning construction. It addresses the debate on emotions that has been ongoing since Aristotle's Rhetoric and continues today with the advent of pragmatic trends in discourse analysis. Indeed, from American psychologist Paul Ekman, known for his work on basic emotions and compassion, to Étienne and Battistelli, who developed annotation schemes for the linguistic analysis of emotions in texts, studies on emotions are increasingly developing. Following the same logic, we would like to analyze here the explicit, implicit, and reconstructed content of emotions present in a selective corpus focused on the speeches at the UN of four Senegalese heads of state: Léopold Sédar Senghor (1960 to 1981), Abdou Diouf (1981 to 2000), Abdoulaye Wade (2000 to 2012), and Macky Sall (2012 to 2024). The aim is to demonstrate that the argumentative exploitation of emotion is a reality in Senegalese political discourse, and that the Senegalese presidents in the corpus use, with persuasive aims, a discursive particularity of emotions based on gestures, voice, and stylistic devices.

Author Biography

  • Fatou GUEYE , Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar

    Fatou GUEYE is a research professor, PhD and Assistant Master at the Cheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar. She is a specialist in discourse linguistics at the Department of Modern Letters. His research focuses on key aspects of discourse, such as: syntax, modalisers, enunciation and pragmatics with a particular interest in referential and organizational indicators. Thus, she explores how these elements influence the construction and interpretation of statements thus enriching contemporary linguistic studies and the contribution and understanding of discursive mechanisms in context. She is also the author of several articles published in her field of research.

References

Amossy R. 2012, L’argumentation dans le discours, Paris, Armand Colin,

Aristote, La Rhétorique, Livre I (définition et fonctionnement de la rhétorique), 329/323

Bronckart J.-P. 1985, « Pour un modèle de production du discours », in J.-P. Bronckart (Edit.), Le fonctionnement des discours, p. 3-58,

Doury M. 2016, Argumentation. Analyser textes et discours, Paris, Armand Colin.

Gardes-Tamine J. 2011, La Rhétorique, Paris, Armand Colin.

Plantin C. 1997 « L’argumentation dans l’émotion », in Pratiques 96, p. 81-100

Plantin C. 1997, « La construction rhétorique des émotions », http://icar.univ-lyon2.fr/Membres/cplantin/documents/1999b.doc

Robrieux J.-J. 2015, Rhétorique et argumentation, Paris, Armand Colin,

Raphael M. 2015, « Esquisse d'une typologie des différents modes de sémiotisation verbale de l'émotion », Semen [En ligne], 35 | 2013, mis en ligne le 21 avril 2015, consulté le 12 août 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/semen/9795 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.9795

Published

2025-08-24

Data Availability Statement

The author states that he did not receive any funding to conduct this study.

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

On the mobilization of emotions in the addresses to the Nation of Senegalese Presidents: Linguistique. (2025). African Notebooks of Rhetoric , 4(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.55595/e2qywg97

Similar Articles

11-20 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.